Two of the most prominent mighty technology in Silicon Valley, Elon Musk and his former protection, Sam Al -Tamman, in the middle of a very general conflict over the future of Obay, the company behind the pioneering chaatgpt.

MUSK – the richest man and executive director in Tesla and Spacex – multiple lawsuits over the past year until last year Prevention of Altman from restructuring Openai From a non -profit, hybridized institution to a profitable company.

Earlier this week, Musk raised the risks by offering the purchase of a non -profit organization for $ 97.4 billion to maintain the original task of the artificial intelligence research laboratory – to ensure that “artificial general intelligence benefits humanity.”

Musk’s proposal was quickly rejected by Altman.

In the last development, Musk said through his lawyer on Wednesday that his offer will fall if Openai remains a non -profit, which prevents the company from reaching billions of dollars.

In the midst of the legal Stoush, the two men publicly circulated the public attacking each other.

How did things turn into sharp among two of the most famous CEOs in Silicon Valley?

What is the origin of the dispute according to Openai?

Musk, 53, Altman, 39, was colleagues.

He participated in the founding of Openai in 2015, along with many other prominent figures in artificial intelligence research. MUSK and Altman served as the first co -chair of the company.

At that time, Musk, as the founder of Tesla and Spacex, was a more famous character in Silicon Valley.

Openai began as a non -profit organization, with a declared task focusing on research and safety, rather than making money.

According to the Openai account, problems began to appear in 2017 when it became clear that it would need more computing power and hundreds of millions of dollars in financing if they hope to create artificial public intelligence.

According to the internal emails that Openai on its website, Musk claimed that Musk wanted to turn into a profitable entity with himself as CEO. With the escalation of the dispute over the future of the company, Musk is said to have withheld financing in revenge.

Musk left the company in 2018, according to Openai, but it was initially supporting its work. Continue to get Twitter in 2022 and The foundations of his AI companyXai, in 2023.

In the years after the departure of Musk, Openai underwent significant changes. In 2019, Openai established a profitable company to help collect funds, and to turn the company into a kind of non -profit hybrid.

Three years later, in 2022, the company became a familiar name, along with Altman, after the pioneering Chatgpt version.

What is the origin of the dispute according to musk?

Tensions between Musk and Altman began to escalate again in 2023 when Microsoft agreed to invest $ 10 billion in Openai, in addition to $ 3 billion in previous investments.

Musk did not respond to Al -Jazeera’s request for comment, but his views are in Openai She was shared in legal deposits.

In a lawsuit last year, Musk claimed that Openai became a sub -submitted company for Microsoft, describing the deal as a deception of “Shakespeare” and offered from Altman to “exchange” in artificial intelligence.

In particular, some Moses’ concerns were involved in the United States and the European Organizers, who also launched anti -monopoly investigations in the deal.

Musk expanded a lawsuit in November, on the pretext that the two companies were monopolizing the market in artificial intelligence.

He claimed that Altman asked investors not to support Xai’s Xai and other competitors during the last Openai tour of donations and said that the relationship of Microsoft and Openai needs to be inappropriate “to preserve the remainder of the non -profit Openai character, free from self -get rid.”

What did Musk and Altman said about each other?

Executive chiefs withdrew punches online, in the media and in the court files. Earlier this week, the couple publicly clashed on X after Musk’s offer to buy the company.

“No, thank you, but we will buy Twitter for $ 9.74 billion if you want,” Altman wrote, using the previous name of X.

“Swindler”, Musk wrote in response.

Altman said in an interview on Tuesday that his former teacher was driven through his demons – instead of caring for the open AI’s open future – and works “from a position on insecurity.”

“I feel bad about the man,” Al -Taman told Bloomberg TV in Paris International Work Summit.

“I think he is the one who slows down a competitor and followed up on his matter, but I don’t really know … to some extent anyone does.”

Musk, for his part, photographed Altman as a greedy man and “unscrupulous” in lawsuits against Openai.

In the court files in August, the Musk lawyer referred to the Open AI administration as “charitable works in the hot air … Long-Con” and “the story of a textbook of altruism in exchange for greed.”

Musk’s lawyers also claimed that Altman and other members of Openai “were deliberately crashed and deceived musk, and they raised the human anxiety of musk about the existential risks of artificial intelligence.”

Why Openai wants to go special?

The ALTman and Openai Board of Directors argues that the company needs a restructuring to obtain its next tour from Softbank, which is a Japanese multinational, which the company recently estimates at $ 260 billion.

Although it is not known that the company is not profitable into a profitable company-especially in the health care sector- Openai endeavor scale Rose Chan Loui, the founding executive director of the Lille Milkin Center on charitable works and non -profit organizations, said that Rose Chan Loui, the founding executive director of the Lille Milkin Center on charitable works and non -profit organizations.

According to the proposed restructuring of Openai, the subsidiary of profit will compensate the non-profit entity for its assets, which creates a new profit company-but Musk of $ 97.4 billion has complicated the deal, She said.

“If there is a transformation, the next challenge is to determine the amount of compensation that you should receive is not profit.

“Elon Musk offers the challenges of the adequacy of this number. The non -profit council will need to” consider “the offer, and Openai will need an explanation – for the non -profit council, as well as for the general lawyers in Dilayer and California – why the Musk’s offer is not better for non -profit organizations than Openai she wants to say “To present it.”

What does Openai say about Musk’s offer?

Besides Altman, the exchange of criticism with Musk Online and in the media, Openai made a proposal to reject the Musk suit.

In court, allegations denied that they tried to prevent funding for other startups and interrogated musk intentions.

In the legal deposits that participated with Al -Jazeera, the attorney of Al -Taman Jordan Eyith said that “Mossa” concerns about the future of Openai do not apply, as long as Musk and his allies are buyers.

“Musk Openai, INC., was transferred by all of his assets, for his economic interest and his competing business from artificial intelligence and private sector investors who have been manually chosen,” said Ehth, according to a report.