The report of the United States’ House of Representatives Judicial Committee says that 99 non -musicians in the “terrorist observation list” have been released in the country. Is this correct?

Claudia Tini, a member of the US House of Representatives, recently claimed that people on the monitoring list “lost” in the United States. The claim came as part of her argument against the New York State Law, which grants driver’s licenses to the New York residents, regardless of them Migration condition.

“New York is one of the worst,” said Republican actor at Fox News. “We had approximately 99 people I think, or 100 people, on the terrorist monitoring list only. This is the one we know.”

Tini, which includes the Congress area of ​​more than dozens of provinces along the beaches of Lake Ontario, which share the border with Canada, also claim that people who appear in the list can obtain licenses.

We will focus on her claim that 99 or 100 immigrants who appear on the “terrorist monitoring menu” were “Letting”.

What does American CBP data show?

Customs protection and US border protection (CBP) The officers face citizens and non -employees on the border who have “terrorist -related” records, including those in the government’s terrorist examination data set. This list contains names of well -known people or suspected of having relationships with “terrorism”, although critics say the list is very wide, which contains two million names. It does not contain only suspicious people, but also people connected to them.

Unresponsive who are trying to cross the border in land entry ports are not found and corresponding to the most common “terrorist” record of our country, re -removing or removing it immediately, “according to CBP. They can also be handed over to another government agency to take enforcement measures.

If CBP officers faced them after entering the country without being examined, “these non -detainees are being held commonly detained, removed or handed over to another government agency for subsequent detention and law enforcement, as necessary.”

Data from the 2024 fiscal year, which ended on September 30, shows that there are 410 meetings with all people who are corresponding to “terrorism” records, which can include American citizens, in entry ports.

The “meetings” can represent multiple attempts by the same person to cross the border. This is a small part of the total total exfoliation meetings on that year. Since 2022, most of these meetings have occurred in US borders Conda. In 2024, 358 of these meetings took place on the northern border and 52 on the southwestern border.

The agency also tracks confrontations between entry ports of non -employees who are identical to the “terrorism” record. There are much fewer than these, only 106 in the year that ended on September 30, with 103 of those on the southwestern border, and 13 October to January, all on the southwestern border.

We contacted Tini’s office for evidence of her demand, but we did not receive any response.

What is the basis of Tini claims?

A Tenie source is likely to be a report issued in August by the Republican Judicial Committee, headed by actor Jim Jordan from Ohio. The report mentioned the “information provided” by the US Department of Internal Security (DHS). However, it has not provided any confirmation or other details. It stipulates at least 99 non -citizens who were matches in the “terrorist monitoring list” that were released in the United States from 2021 to 2023.

He was 34 additional immigrants from the list in the seizure of the Ministry of National Security. The report uses a language to suggest that the immigration authorities knew at the time of the release that non -employees were listed on the list. The report states that 99 came from a group of 250 non -residents who tried to cross them on the southern border and who were determined as being included in the list. CBP statistics show 250 meetings with people in the monitoring list during the years 2021 until 2023 on the southern border. There can be multiple meetings with the same person in those statistics.

The report notes other cases through which people on the list without discovery and were later arrested, including the case of eight citizens of Tajik with potential relations with the ISIS group (ISIS) that entered the country and were arrested in June. Their “terrorist” relations were not known when they crossed the border, according to NBC News.

A similar case included a two -year -old Uzbek man without discovery. Other examples are immigrants who have not been verified in the monitoring menu.

The report also claims that immigration judges granted bonds to 27 migrants who appeared on a “terrorist monitoring list” but they came on the border between the entry ports from 2021 to 2023. However, the judges may not have known the position of migrants in the list the report says.

Four others were granted in the list of asylum. A Venezuelan citizen What was known by the authorities appears on the monitoring list was launched in the United States due to concerns about Covid-19 in detention facilitiesAccording to government documents obtaining a reporter.

CBP referred our questions about the authenticity of the report to DHS, which did not answer our inquiries.

So what is the truth behind the allegations that people in the terrorist monitoring list “have been released in the United States?

The migrants with possible “terrorist” relations were recently news.

There were also no less than two other cases that were reported, the migrants should have been detained because they were on the “terrorist observation list” but they were not. In April, NBC News reported that an Afghan immigrant was on the observation list and released. He was arrested a year later in Texas, hours after the NBC report. The man did not have at the beginning because border agents did not have enough information to confirm his location on the list, the network said.

The Daily Caller mentioned in 2024 about the unnecessary immigrant release with the monitoring list. He was arrested about a year later, two days after the authorities confirmed his relations with a “terrorist” Somali group.

Politifact expert told that there is no reliable reports of any type of state or federal “hunting and release” that includes known “terrorists” or known as KSTS.

“In contrast, if KST is arrested on the border, or anywhere else, they will be tried either [if part of a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization] Jason M Plazakis, director of the Terrorism, Extremist and Combating Terrorism Center at the Middlebberry Institute for International Studies in Monterey, said that removing it from the country and sending it to their country of origin.

Blazakis questioned the accuracy of the report of the House of Representatives, saying it lacks details.

Aaron Reichlin Melinak, a senior colleague of the US Immigration Council, said that the “terrorist monitoring list” can include many people who are not immediately threatening.

“This does not mean that there are no people on that list that pose a serious threat to the United States,” said Reichlin-Maelank. “But complaints about the list being very large and the price of more than a decade.”

Launching people known to be on the “terrorist monitoring list” is not CBP policy. Tiny is right, and that there are known cases of people who appear on the list released in the United States. These cases largely included people who were not known to put in the list of immigration authorities at a time when they crossed the border.

The Judicial Committee in the House of Representatives issued a report stating that there were 99 non -citizens who appeared in the monitoring list that was released in the United States, and suggested that the immigration authorities were aware of their placement at that time. The report was martyred “the information provided” by the Ministry of National Security, but the administration did not confirm the report. Because of this uncertainty, we do not measure this claim for our reality.