The leading authority in the United States Supreme Court issued a rare statement to reprimand US President Donald Trump for his call to isolate the Federal judge.

On Tuesday, the chief judge John Roberts issued two brief lines, either of them mentioned Trump by name.

But his message was clear: the federal judge threat with dismissal is unacceptable.

“For more than two centuries, it has been proven that accountability is not an appropriate response to the dispute regarding the judicial decision.

Roberts’s comments within hours of Missive arrived at Trump’s social media, where Judge James E Bosburg, who works at the Federal Provincial Court in Washington, criticized Washington.

Trump wrote in a long position that appears to be arguing that the presidential authority did not replace the judiciary: “This radical judge left the judge, who is riots and incitement that was unfortunately appointed by Barack Hussein Obama, president.” “He did not win the popular vote.”

Boasberg recently ordered the Trump administration to stop the deportations conducted under the Law of Foreign Enemies for the year 1798, which allows the warheads to detain and deport foreign citizens from an “hostile country”.

This act was used only three times before the war and only during the war, and the last case was the forced prison of Japanese Americans and foreign citizens during World War II.

However, the Trump administration continued to take deportations under the law on Saturday evening, which led some to speculate that it had violated Pasperg’s orders.

Boasberg has not yet ruled whether the Trump administration had disobeyed court orders. But he called for lawyers from the US Department of Justice to provide a schedule for a time that launched deportations, in addition to other information about the events of Saturday night.

However, Trump called for Bouasberg – who was appointed to various positions in the judicial system by Republican and Democratic presidents – to remove him from his post.

“This judge, just like many twisted judges, must be forced to appear before, was isolated !!!” Trump wrote on Tuesday morning.

Congress has already enjoys the power of isolation of federal judges, although these cases are rare.

The last federal judge is isolated G thomas porteousWho served in the eastern region of Louisiana: he was accused of accepting bribes and issuing wrong data, which led to his removal from his post in 2010.

This is not the first time that Trump has made such a threat. In November 2023, for example, as he faced a civilian investigation into the alleged fraud in Trump, Trump called for isolating both the judge in the case and the main public prosecutor.

Ruling on [Arthur] He wrote, “English and Letitia James must be isolated and removed from his position to reduce the values ​​of my assets, often, in order to hurt me and wrestling.”

But since returning to his post for a second term on January 20, Trump has faced a set of legal challenges for many controversial political changes.

The Republicans lined up behind, echoing his criticism of many judges as biased and corrupt.

On Saturday, Boasberg commanded a new wave of such a speech, as many right -wing legislators called for it.

Another day, another judge decides unilaterally for the entire country. books On social media.

Meanwhile, actor Brandon Jill said that he had provided materials from the dismissal in the House of Representatives against the “radical activist” Pasperg.

“He is guilty of high crimes and crimes and must be removed from his post,” Jill to publish On his social media on Tuesday.

Even Elon Musk, the donor to the Trump re -election campaign and the White House advisor, was weighed on Monday.

“The worst judges – those who raise the law over and over again – must be placed at least in the dismissal vote, whether this vote succeeds or not,” Musk He said On its social media platform X.

But the head of judges, Roberts, has long defended the court’s regime against this pressure.

Last year, in his report at the end of the year, Roberts condemned the legislators’ attempts to push for political grounds.

“Public officials, too, have participated in recent attempts to intimidate judges – for example, indicating the political bias in the negative judgments of the judge without a reliable basis for such allegations,” Roberts, Roberts. books.

“During the past year, we also saw the need for federal lawyers and the defense of the federal boycott judge, who prompted its decisions in a high -level case to an elected official to invite her attempts to intimidate judges on their rulings on cases and should be a ruling.”

The American Lawyers Association referred to this direction, as Trump’s second term is revealed.

The association wrote in a statement On March 3.

“This was only directed to the judges who ruled against the government’s position.”