Digest opened free editor

Rola Khaleda, FT editor, chooses her favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.

Sir Kerr Starmer was told on Tuesday that Britain is facing a “world where everything has changed”, as he torn the country’s foreign aid budget to finance unprecedented rearmament program since the Cold War.

There was a feeling in the glory of the glory of the glory that what is Curtain The “Great War More”, where Britain and the rest of Europe are adaptive to Donald Trump’s overwhelming impact.

Rest rate. On Wednesday, UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves will meet with the European Union’s finance ministers at a Group 20 Group in Cape Town to discuss a new financing mechanism to rebuild the continent’s defenses.

On Thursday, Starmer meets President Trump at the White House to be held accountable to maintain US security in Europe, while the UK Prime Minister is looking to host a new round of defense with European leaders in London on Sunday.

Amid the wave of activity, the position of foreign policy in Britain turned overnight. The country, which is proud of the “great power” that spent 0.7 percent of its national income on external assistance will now be less generous.

“It is not a declaration that I am pleased to make,” said Starmer, who revealed that the aid budget, which has already reduced to 0.5 percent in 2027.

Like an increase in the UK in the same defensive expenditures, the decision of the aid budget raid with Trump’s approval, which has begun to manage the dismantling of the American Development Program, the US Agency for International Development.

It was an amazing moment: George Osborne maintained the goal of 0.7 percent aid throughout his years that transports the budget in the treasury in the wake of the financial collapse. Now the prime minister was taking an ax to him.

Starmer insisted that he had to provide resources to achieve “peace through power”, as he throws himself as a defender of the post -war settlement of the Atlantic, led by the statesmen, Clement Athli and Ernest Beven.

He said he was a “proud legacy”, but he added that the task of preserving it “was not a light as it was before” – without mentioning Trump by name.

Analysts confirmed Starmer’s claim that the increase in defensive spending is from 2.3 percent of GDP to 2.5 percent – and perhaps to 3 percent in the next parliament – the largest planned increase in defense spending in the United Kingdom since the end of the second world war.

“The dual commitment-to 2.5 percent by 2027 and 3.0 percent by 2034-will be the most sustainable growth in defense spending since 1945,” said Malcolm Chalmers, Deputy Director General of Thought Vehicles at the Royal United Institute of Services. “The ability to develop long -term plans and obligations.”

He added, “Now the spotlight will be in Germany and France to find out whether they can also raise this joint challenge,” which is to take responsibility for defending the continent.

The Starmer movement was welcomed by the higher figures in the military and defensive circles, which it said was delayed, but will give more maneuvering to Lord George Robertson, the former Secretary -General of NATO who leads a strategic and security defense review of the Prime Minister, which will lead the strategic review of the Prime Minister. This spring report.

“The increase in spending” is indispensable if Starmer will lead, with [French President Emmanuel] Macron, the European response to Trump and the European security disorder that he produced. ”

He added that the most important priority is to reformulate the British army, which is “a decade in investment” and was last repaired for publication in Iraq and Afghanistan, to become “reliable in use in Europe.”

Earlier on Tuesday, Conservative Party leader Kimi Badnosh called on the government to “re -display” aid budget to finance a rise in defense expenditures – “at least in the short term” – and suggested that some spending on social welfare as well.

In a speech on Edwar about London’s chilk, she would support Starmer in “making difficult decisions” to increase defensive spending.

The goal of the current aid of 0.5 per cent of the total national income was considered vulnerable to more discounts, as senior diplomats and former leaders raised fears that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs budget is likely to be pressure to review the upcoming spending.

The move sparked anger from activists, who are already important to spend more than a quarter of a UK aid budget to support asylum seekers and refugees in Britain. Starmer said the goal is to reduce the asylum bill.

Romlley Greenhil, CEO of Bond Network, UK Network of NGOs, criticized in a “short -sighted and horrific move by both the Prime Minister and the Ministry”, which said, “It will have devastating consequences for millions of marginalized people around the world” Will Will ” Weakening national security services. ”

However, some British diplomats supported Sarmer Starmer. One of them said: “It is very doubtful whether maintaining help to an arbitrary number is the best way to move forward.”