The Worst Star Trek Movie Hides An Even Darker Secret

0 0 5 minutes read

by Drew Deitch
| Published 28 seconds ago

How do you choose the worst Star Trek movies? There are a lot of criteria to judge by. Do you go with the person you feel is the most boring? What about the one with the stupidest plot? Maybe you should choose The one Which effectively killed the movie franchise for over half a decade?

These are all valid metrics for judging the worst Star Trek A film is produced, but we have to look at this decision through a broader and deeper lens. There are a lot of superficial reasons why Star Trek is the worst of the bunch. While some have misunderstoodThere are others who received some disdain. He is Star Trek V: The Final Frontier A funny vanity project with a mockery-worthy climax? probably. He is Star Trek: Nemesis A weak and uncharacteristic farewell to The next generation crew? certainly.

But these criticisms alone do not earn them the title of worst Star Trek movie. Achieving such status requires a story that is at the heart of Star Trek’s optimism and hope. It must be extremely stupid in the plot department, lazy and a bit sacrilegious in concept, and secretly insulting to everything Star Trek is supposed to stand for.

This leaves only one option for the worst Star Trek movie: Star Trek Into Darkness.

Deck of the worst Star Trek movie

The worst Star Trek movie to pinch the dark neck — How do you feel watching? *Star Trek Into Darkness*.

There are a number of profound reasons for this Star Trek Into Darkness It qualifies as the worst Star Trek movie, but before we really open this up, let’s dig into some more of the problems and faults that the movie has.

The most pressing issue is that Star Trek Into Darkness He wants a bed from Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khanis arguably the fan-favorite entry in the entire series. It’s not inherently a bad thing when a film remakes or retcons of elements from a previous popular entry, but the method Star Trek Into Darkness He deals with it Wrath of Khan Embarrassing parts.

Benedict CumberbatchThe film’s performance is both stately and somewhat muted at the same time, never quite reaching the melodramatic joy of Ricardo Montalbán’s character. Even more egregious is the tone-deaf remix of the unforgettable “Khan” song! She screams Where Zachary Quinto is providing his vocals at this moment and it’s just… *sigh*.

It is worth noting the cast Star Trek Into Darkness They do their best with a truly outrageous script. Abrams struck gold when he rebooted his series back in 2009, but a good cast can’t salvage a story full of weak character motivations, leaps in storytelling logic that don’t hold up if you think about it for a moment, and an overall tone that’s constantly at war with itself.

the address Star Trek Into Darkness It certainly evokes a feeling of, “This Star Trek movie is going to be serious business!” That’s certainly what the film wants you to believe, but its wild transitions from disturbing bleakness to goofy character parts clash too hard and clash with each other. The film never finds its tonal rhythm.

Part of this reason is Star Trek Into Darkness It’s a mess when it comes to filmmaking.

Chaos behind the camera

worst star trek movie jj abrams — JJ Abrams on set *Star Trek Into Darkness*.

When JJ Abrams took over the feature film franchise in 2009 Star TrekHe brought a special sense of manic action energy to the series. To be fair, the The next generation The films have certainly established this in terms of tone, but their filmmaking methods have remained relatively constant. A large part of this was the fact that purely digital camera work had not evolved to the point where it could deliver believable landscapes and smooth camera movements.

However, this capability was in place by 2009 Star Trek It rolled, and Abrams used it to his full advantage. Thanks to this aesthetic and energetic choice, he increased his size to 11 inches Star Trek Into Darkness This is unbearable. It’s an onslaught of noise and visual hoopla that stops working as a story.

But this filmmaking choice wasn’t so annoying in the 2009 film because it seemed in sync with that film’s smug tone. Star Trek Into DarknessThe decision to try to be dark while maintaining the visual language of a more exciting adventure story heightens this dissonance.

However, all of these issues and more – the mishandling of the villain, the poor characterization, the problematic portrayal of the female characters – all pale in comparison to the truth-making element. Star Trek Into Darkness Worst Star Trek movie.

Star Trek treachery into the dark

Worst Star Trek to Dark Science movie — This kind of image is not accidental.

When we talk about the worst Star Trek movie ever made, we have to think about more than just how this movie behaves on its own terms. Star Trek Into Darkness Failed as a piece of Science fiction Action cinema, but what becomes absolutely disgusting is how it relates to the history of Star Trek as a vision and ideal.

screenwriter Roberto Orci Was able to use Star Trek Into Darkness As a metaphor for his hateful conspiracy theories regarding 9/11 attacks. This may seem silly, but the inclusion of a dedication at the end of the film to “Post-9/11 Veterans” recolors the entire film.

The details of this reading of the film are well documented elsewhere, so I won’t parrot all these observations. Instead, I want to emphasize why this particular aspect is what really makes Star Trek Into Darkness Worst Star Trek movie.

worst star trek movie into darkness vengeance 9 11 — This kind of image is not accidental.

As a fictional concept, Star Trek is meant to represent the most optimistic possibilities for humanity. Yes, there have been critical episodes throughout the series that have tested the integrity of Star Trek ideals – including Best episode of Deep Space Nine — but it always came from a place of devotion and heart to the world that Star Trek wanted to build.

Star Trek Into Darkness He removes that hope and replaces it with shameless sarcasm. It discredits Starfleet and the Federation by portraying them as an inherently corrupt organization headed by a leader who wants to incite war at any cost. It rips out the heart of Star Trek and replaces it with something so rotten that it’s impossible to even watch the movie without feeling sick.

That’s not to say that the Star Trek universe can’t handle self-critical and darker stories. Deep Space Nine It is my favorite Star Trek seriesThe main reason for this is her desire to hold a candle to the ideals and practices of the Federation and Starfleet. But the creators are behind Deep Space Nine You clearly have a deep and understanding love for Star Trek behind the main creators Star Trek Into Darkness Don’t share. Instead, they exploited Star Trek so they could promote a misanthropic worldview that is ugly in itself, but becomes even uglier when channeled through the Star Trek universe.

It is clear that these creative forces led to this atrocity. sequel, Star Trek Beyondreplaced director and writers, resulting in one of the best reboot films. This film was able to raise some critical feelings towards the Union without having to resort to a cunning political agenda.

That’s the big reason for it Star Trek Into Darkness It has to be the worst Star Trek movie. You can debate the imaginative and technical merits of all the other films, but nothing comes close to representing something so sublime at its core. If you like Star Trek, you probably like its attitude toward humanity and its belief that we can work together for the greater good. If you like Star Trek, you like Hope. Star Trek Into Darkness She is a hopeless, vengeful, and immoral pest named after Star Trek.

If that doesn’t make it the worst Star Trek movie, I don’t know what does. I’ll take God’s need Spacecraft On this any day.