Justin Baldoni’s Lawyer Slams Blake Lively’s Move to Dismiss Lawsuit

Justin Balouni and Blake BlakeHer lawyers call each other on Livel’s proposal End with us The director came against it.
Bian Friedman This step was described as “hateful” and described it as “misuse of the system” through a statement issued by US weekly Thursday 20 March.
He said through the statement: “Mrs. Livly’s recent movement is to reject herself from the catastrophe that the self that began began is one of the most hateful examples of misuse of our legal system.” “The strict rules are placed in their place to protect innocent people and allow individuals to truly defend themselves. It is not intended from twisted laws and ingenuity by the distinguished elites to suit their personal agenda.”
He continued, “As we said yesterday, in response to the measurements of Mr. Reynolds herself, we will continue to hold Mrs. Livly accountable for her behavior of pure malice, which includes false from my clients of harassment and revenge.
A spokesman criticized the vibrant statement we I got to the comment.
“A wave of answers late at night – instead of the suggestions they separate – reveal this [Baldoni and Wayfarer defendants] I know that they have no legal arguments that are capable of refusing our complaints. we On Friday, March 21. “They instead accepted that Mrs. Levli’s complaint stipulates that they are valid that they could not mobilize one reason for his rejection. Meanwhile, everyone and the entity made by the Baldoni-wwayfarer team that was sued to his refusal moved.”
Earlier on Thursday, Polly, 37, presented the movement To reject the lawsuit, according to the documents you witnessed we.
“This lawsuit is a deep abuse of the legal process that has no place in the Federal Court. California law is now frankly prohibited by a lawsuit against victims who make a decision to speak against sexual harassment or revenge, whether in a lawsuit or in the press,” Lavell’s lawyer Mike Gottlieb and Asra Hudson He said we In a statement.
The statement continued, “This lawsuit, which is indisputable and vengeful, first tends to three legal obstacles, including litigation, fair report, and sexual harassment privileges, which the latter contain a mandatory ruling to change the fees against MS. The” parties’ attempt to sue Mrs. Livly “in forgetfulness” have only created more responsibility for them, and thanks to that, given what they did. “

A spokesman for Livly said we, “The painful truth is that Mrs. Livly is not alone in the prosecution of defamation after talking about exposure to sexual harassment at work. This is the reason that California recently Cent 933, the distinguished incident of communications that lead to sexual assault, harassment or identification of the legal claim, which is what he explains in the California civil section 47.1. Protection, and that there is a specific law that explicitly protects them from silence Destroy financially through a defaming lawsuit because they have the courage to speak. “
He was 41 -year -old, and vitality Involved Because they completed the film’s adaptation Colin Hoover The best -selling novel, It ends with us.
After rumors that may be abandoned by inferiority and vitality spread in August 2024 while promoting the film, the couple there confirmed hostility when the lawsuits were launched after months.
In December 2024, I am accused of vital debt From sexual harassment and launching a defamation campaign against it (it rejects accusations.)
For his part, he went without the file A 400 million dollar lawsuit Against vitality, her husband, Ryan ReynoldsAnd its propaganda in January, noting that defamation is among other claims. The couple denied the accusations. Reynolds submitted to reject the lawsuit In the court documents obtained before we On Tuesday, March 18th.
https://www.usmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Justin-Baldoni-lawyer-calls-Blake-Lively-motion-to-dismiss-abhorrent.jpg?crop=0px%2C0px%2C1998px%2C1051px&resize=1200%2C630&quality=86&strip=all
2025-03-21 14:38:00