It is possible that a few voters will expect President Donald Trump in the first weeks of his administration to cut billions of dollars from the country’s first federal cancer research agency.

However Project 2025“The leadership of the leadership”, a conservative plan for the ruling, said that he knows nothing during his campaign. Now, I embraced his administration.

the 922 page Playbook “The NIH monopoly to direct research” must be broken and calls for defining payments to universities and their hospitals “to help reduce the support of federal taxpayers for left -wing agenda.”

Universities, which are now scheduled to confront comprehensive discounts in the agency grants that cover these general costs, say that policy will destroy continuous and future biomedical sciences. A federal judge temporarily suspended discounts in the field of medical research On February 10 After they faced legal challenges from medical institutions and 22 states.

Project 2025 as an introduction

The rapid adoption of many Project 2025 goals indicates that Trump’s supporters-many of its shareholders were old warriors during his first term, and some joined his second administration-years of calmness of the basis for disrupting the national health system. This is facing Trump’s insistence on the campaign’s path, after the Democrats made the project 2025 strong attack line, that he was ignorant of the document.

“I have no idea about the 2025 project,” Trump said on October 31, 2024, in a march in Albukirk, New Mexico. “I never read it, and I will never do it.”

But since his administration is heading to the founding of the founding foundation, the heritage institution, says opposition groups and some democratic leaders in the state that they are able to act quickly to confront Trump’s moves in court.

They are now preparing for Trump to work on the recommendations of the 2025 project for some of the largest and most important health programs in the country, including Medicaid and Medicare, Federal health agencies.

“There was a lot of planning on the side of litigation to challenge executive orders and other early procedures from many different organizations,” said Noah Bouznander, the head of the citizens for responsibility and ethics in Washington, which is a monitoring group. “The project 2025 allowed some preparation.”

The plan, for example, calls for the state’s flexibility to impose premiums for some beneficiaries, work requirements, age hats or time limits to cover medical aid for some registered in the program of Americans with low incomes and disabled, which may lead to an increase in an unailed number after the Biden administration has expanded the program cover.

“These proposals do not directly change Medicaid or the benefits provided, but the final impact will be a fewer number of people with health coverage,” said Larry Levitt, Executive Vice President of Health Policy at Kaiser Family (KFF), a non -profit health institution that includes KFF Health News. “When you create barriers in front of the people registered in Medicaid, such as installments or documenting the status of work, you end up codifying coverage through complexity and the ability to pay.”

Republicans in Congress are considering a budget plan that can cut hundreds of billions of dollars from Medicaid for 10 years.

The 2025 project called for the expansion of access to health plans that do not correspond to The law of welfare at reasonable prices The most powerful consumer protection. This may lead to more choice and reduce monthly installments for buyers, but unintended consumers may face significant costs outside the pocket for care that will not be covered by plans.

The project also called for 2025 to stop financing medical aid for companies affiliated with the planned paternity. The organization, an important healthcare provider for women throughout the country, gets about $ 700 million annually from Medicaid and other government programs, based on its report 2022-23. The report says that abortion constitutes about 4 percent of the services provided by the organization to patients.

Management steps to clean words such as “property rights” from federal documents, and the convertible identifier Reducing international medical assistance – Each part of the Project Wishes of 2025 – It has already had comprehensive repercussions, access to health care and canceling international programs aimed at preventing the disease and improving the results of the mother’s health.

Under a A note issued in JanuaryFor example, Trump re -prohibited and expanded a ban on federal funds of global organizations that provide legal information on abortion.

Studies have found that the embargo, known as a “global gap” or “Mexico City Policy”, has stripped millions of dollars from External aid The groups you did not abide by. He also had a chilling effect: In Zambia, one group removed information on brochures on contraceptives, and in Turkiye, some service providers with patients stopped menstruation as a form of family planning.

The 2025 project called on the next president to restore the gag base, saying that “it should be widely formulated to apply for all external assistance.”

Trump also signed an executive order for a decline in the rights of transgender people Ban Federal Funds For the care related to the transition to people under the age of 19. Order The federal government also directed the recognition only of both sexes, males and females, and using the term “sex” instead of “sex”.

Project Document 2025 calls for the deletion of the term “sexual identity” from federal rules, regulations and grants, for the policies and procedures in which its authors say to apply “a fundamental redefinition of sex.” In addition, it states that the programs of the Ministry of Health and Humanitarian Services must “protect the minds of children and bodies.”

“Radical actors within and outside the government enhances the harmful identity policy that replaces biological sex with self -concepts of” sexual identity “,” reads the project of the project 2025.

Data disappears

Health researchers say that CDC control centers (CDC) is a result of Trump on sexual identity Upload information via the Internet About transgender health and data removal about LGBTQ+ Health. A federal judge ordered on February 11 to restore a lot of information; The administration complied but added notifications to some web pages describing them “very inaccurate” and claiming that it “does not reflect biological reality.”

The Center for Disease Control also delayed the launch of information and results on bird flu in the agency’s reference and weekly death. In addition, Federal workers said they were told to retreat from the papers containing words such as “not built” or “transgender”. Some hospitals have suspended the sponsorship of sexual assurance, such as hormonal therapy and puberty blockers.

Da`wah groups say that the orders have distinguished and constituted barriers in front of the necessary care, and the transgender children and their families have provided a number of court challenges.

Lawyers, preachers and researchers say that the implementation of many of the project’s health policy goals 2025 is a threat.

“The Playbook book provides the agenda of control, data control, and greed control,” according to researchers at Boston University last year in JAMA magazine.

The project plan sets 2025 goals to reduce access to drug abortion, restructure public health agencies, and to weaken sex -based protection. The elderly would have scored virtual in the Medicare Advantage plans managed by commercial insurance companies, in essence, privatizing the health program for the elderly Americans. It calls for the elimination of coverage requirements for a reasonable prices of care law that people buy without federal subsidies, which, as insurance experts say, risk leaving people who are not believers.

“It is the Trump administration agenda,” said Robert Weissman, a co -chair of the public citizen, a progressive group to defend the consumer rights. “It reduces access to care under the strict work requirements in Medicaid, the privatization of medical care, and the decline in consumer protection and the suffering of the law of affordable prices.”

The White House did not respond to a message seeking a comment. Conservatives said that the implementation of the project’s proposals will lead to reducing waste and fraud in federal health programs and free health systems from the clutches of the agenda that radically “wake up”.

“The Americans are tired of using their government against them,” Paul Dance, the lawyer and former project manager 2025, said in a statement 2024. “The administrative state, at best, is completely far from the American people, and in the worst case, they are weapons against them.”

DANS did not answer messages seeking a comment for this article.

The Heritage Foundation has sought to separate itself and the 2025 project on Trump’s executive orders and other health initiatives.

“This is not related to our recommendations in the 2025 project – something we do for more than 40 years. Eileen Keenan, a heritage spokeswoman, said that this revolves around President Trump’s introduction to his promises to make America safer, stronger and better than ever, and he and his team deserved.

Versions of the document have been produced almost every four years since the eighties of the last century and affected the heads of other Republican Party. The group said that former President Ronald Reagan approved about two thirds of the recommendations of the previous heritage guide.

In some cases, the Trump administration did not follow the project proposals 2025 but exceeded it.

The following document called for the expansion of the Dradicalise and the US International Development Agency (USAID), an independent federal agency providing external aid and assistance, including many international health programs.

The administration was not only Limiting the intermediate intermediary. Trump’s adviser, Elon Musk, boasted on his social media platform, X, that the “Ministry of Governmental efficiency” fed the agency “in wood”, closed its offices physically and put almost all its employees on an administrative leave while finishing funding for its programs and publishing wrong information about them.

But the administration risk reduces public support if it adopts the project’s goals to raise the health policy and US health policy. Nearly 60 percent of the voters said they felt negatively on the 2025 project in a survey conducted by NBC News in September.

“The project was not 2025 to think at all.” Ally Boguhn, a spokesman for the reproductive freedom for all, is the abortion rights group, it was always planned. “We are only a few weeks in his presidency, which is the basis for more.”