Blake Blake and Justin BalouniHer lawyers were represented in the first court hearing on Monday, February 3.

Levli, 37, and Baldouni, 41 years old, were not expected to attend Monday. The spouses – both who were both filed lawsuits against each other – were appointed to trial on March 9, 2026, according to the documents obtained by NBC News. During the 90 -minute session on Monday, Federal Judge Louis J. Liman indicated that the date of the trial of March 2026 can be raised if complaints continue to “litigate in the press”. Delivery date I mentioned.

Days before the session, Levli and her husband, Ryan Reynoldsand He claims that he objects to his dislocation By the Donia lawyer, Bian FriedmanFor all the court documents obtained before US weekly. Because Baldoni’s pulsaries or intuitive Baldoni attorneys were not distinguished, they asked the court to weigh on Monday. “I don’t think you will be the one who chooses who takes the deposit of Mrs. LVly,” Judge Lean said to Livly’s lawyer on Monday.

The judge also indicated that the lengthy timeline in the inferiority is likely to be likely to be from the record. On Saturday, February 1, Balmouni He released a web siteThelawsuitinfo.com, which includes two PDF files entitled “Modified complaint” and “The Timette of Related Events” available for download. However, the judge said on Monday, “You can not only attach a realistic narration” with a complaint.

Related to: Blake Livley and Ryan Reynolds are seeking to reject Justin’s claim

Blake Levli and Ryan Reynolds are seeking to reject Justin’s appearance lawsuit. Levli, 37, told Rynolds, 48, a federal judge on Thursday, January 30, that they would move to reject the legal procedure attached to them by the American director, 40, Fariti mentioned the same day. For each variety, each side […]

Lively’s reaction was to the first session, with his news we In a statement: “We are happy with the result of the hearing today and we feel the move immediately with a discovery in this case. With sexual harassment and revenge.

At the same time, he told a lawyer of the blogging we“Our customers have destroyed and want to move the issue as soon as possible. We cannot be happier about how to deal with the issue today, and how it was managed. We will move as soon as we can prove our innocence, in a world where people rule sometimes before it gives you a chance. We will change it. “

After months Speaking from the rift between End with us Costars, vibrant Baldoni accused sexual harassment and created an inappropriate work environment on the husband’s movie group in a lawsuit filed in December 2024. He denied all allegations.

He went without one and other prosecutors New York Times In December 2024, which broke the story. Spokesman New York Times He said we At a time when the perpetrator plans to “defend strongly against the lawsuit”. In January 2025, a Balmone Studio also filed a separate lawsuit against Livly, Reynolds, 48, and its propaganda, Leslie SloanSearch for $ 400 million of damage.

Lively’s legal reaction to the lawsuit, and partially exchanged, “their response to the allegations of sexual harassment: she wanted to do so, it is her mistake. They justified them for the reason for this to her: Look at what she was wearing. In short, while the victim focuses on abuse, the aggressor focuses on The victim. The strategy of attacking women is desperate, and does not refute the evidence of Mrs. Livly, and it will fail.

Related to: Justin Balouni’s lawyer Blake Blake Livly collides

War of words between Justin Baldoni and Blake Levli does not show any sign of stopping. The Branian Friedman’s lawyer issued a fiery response to Levli’s allegations that he is trying to distort the jury gathering in his upcoming trial, especially by leaking information in an attempt to refute the actress from the story. […]

Amid the legal battle, a lawyer was issued 10 minutes of the shots from End with us Put in an attempt to prove his side of the story. The Levli Baldoni team and his team criticized the selection of dropping out the shots, but he also claimed that he had shown her in distress.

The statement concluded that “any woman has been inappropriately touched at the workplace will learn about the discomfort of Mrs. Livly.” “They will learn about her attempt to try to transform unwanted touch. No woman should take defensive measures to avoid touching by the employer without her consent.”

In response to the Legal team in Levli and their allegations related to the footage we“When Mr. Baldouni exercises his right to publicly defend himself by presenting actual facts and evidence, Mrs. Livly and a team this becomes morally and morally. To be wrong.

Lively and Reynolds continued to submit a letter in the court in search of a preventive order against Baldoni Freedman’s lawyer. A few days later, a lawyer Kevin Fritz The judge was asked to reject the gag order if he was officially requested.

It is claimed that Livly and Reynolds told a federal judge that they were seeking to reject a blasphemy case. we I arrived at a delegate of inferior to comment at that time.