Confusion, along with some eloquence, prevails in the public and political class in Israel, which is still unclear in relation to the comments of US President Donald Trump, really about Gaza.

For the extreme right and the extremist Orthodox factions of Israeli policy, the idea is logical-that Gaza population is displaced to make way for the United States to oversee a kind of reconstruction that it is supposed to be in the end to the people of Israel.

However, some analysts saw the functional defect in Trump’s sudden statements about the land that its people do not claim, noting that this brute force could easily be applied to Israelis in illegal settlements throughout the Palestinian West Bank.

A poll conducted by Israeli Channel 13 showed that while 72 percent of the Israelis loved the idea of ​​US President Donald Trump that the United States controlled the Gaza Strip, only 35 percent believed that it would be implemented at all.

It is not clear on the equal footing of observers throughout the Israeli policy is how Trump’s statements can be proportional to outside the ceasefire deal from three stages between Hamas and Israel to end the unrestricted Israel war on Gaza.

Promises

The belief that Palestine was Israel of a kind of divine right is the justified justification for the actions of politicians, such as the “Gay” Fascist Minister of Finance, “Bizalil Smotrich, right -warehouses and former National Security Minister Itamar bin Ghaffir, and the settler movements such as Nachala, which organized a conference in January of the year The past is to discuss the colonization of Gaza.

The ceasefire agreement, which means that Israel will have to stop bombing Gaza, and the disappointment of the far -right hope, which seemed to want to continue the attack so that Israel can demand the entire pocket.

In the accumulation of signing the deal on January 17, Smotrich and Ben-GVir threatened to resign from the government to object to its circumstances.

Bin Ghafir only resigned, but he left behind a Judaet Autozma party in the ruling coalition, making his steps appear to lead to many observers.

Smotrich was “persuaded” to stay in exchange for the assurances of Netanyahu that he had no intention to honor the deal signed with Hamas and the war will resume once the first stage is completed.

Aspirations

At first glance, Trump’s strange idea appears to advance the ultimate goal of controlling Gaza.

“Trump went further than anyone expected,” Mitchell Barak, an Israeli reconnaissance expert and a former political assistant for Israeli senior figures, including Netanyahu, told Al -Jazeera.

“In the short term, what Trump provided is better than what could have been hoping for Smotrich and Bin Ghafir.”

Bin Ghaffir soon said that the possibility of clearing Gaza ethnicity may be sufficient to persuade him to forget the previous grievances and return to the government.

“We have a great opportunity and we should not miss it,” he told Radio Ghali Israel on Wednesday. “There were those who worked on this in Israel a long time ago and gained titles such as” Messianic and Inquided “.

Nachhala claimed that she was preparing to seize Gaza as soon as her people are cleared, according to the conditions set by Trump, ethnically.

However, Barak pointed out: “They are [Israel’s far right] You will not decide how this thing will end; Trump, and part of his plan is to find a solution for the Palestinians. It is still possible to involve a kind of solution from the two countries, “referring to the establishment of a Palestinian state alongside Israel.

“If Trump has the ability to dismantle Gaza, then he also has the ability to transfer Israelis from settlements,” Barak warned.

confusion

There were not many details in Trump’s comments.

He did not say whether he was calling for the payment of the United States’ policy that dates back to contracts represented in the search for a two -state solution to Palestine, if he proposes temporary ethnic cleansing in Gaza, or how his idea sat inside the discontinuation of three stages frankly an agreement.

The reporting of the Times and other ports suggested that large parts of the Trump advertisement seemed to have been presented without prior consultation for assistants or allies, which represents many international reactions from countries unaware of his proposals, and the President’s quick warning to Foreign Minister Marco Rubio and the White House spokesman. Caroline Levitte, who made it clear that the president’s proposals were temporary and did not represent an American military commitment to Gaza.

“Let’s say that we are taking Trump seriously,” said the former Israeli ambassador and government adviser Alon Benkas for the Al -Jazeera channel.

Israel must adhere to the deal and see it at least in the second stage [when the population transfer might take place].

“Now, say that we do not do Hamas? He still has any incentive to stay with the ceasefire. They and everyone else in Gaza, all of them 2.3 million, will be expelled anyway. Where are their motives to maintain the ceasefire agreement?

“Ben-GVIR and Smotrich and at least others are clear in what they want [the ethnic cleansing of Gaza]. They do not bother themselves with mysterious concepts, such as international law, which Netanyahu must. “

Spoilers

If the United States is ethnically cleaned Gaza, even temporarily, then Smotrich and Ben-GVIR and their allies will feel near their hope for its long time than ever.

So, as Penxas suggests, Trump’s intervention leads to a ceasefire, at least they get a return to the war they supported within 15 months of unrestricted massacre.

In both cases, it is possible that Netanyahu will appear stronger, either through the unified cabinet and society or as a war leader, who defends what he proposes as the “Jewish homeland”.

Even the threat of early elections, as Barak suggested, may play to the end of the Prime Minister.

“New elections will make any government control,” he said, referring to the various challenges facing the government in addition to the potential threat posed by its right, such as the next budget and discussion about Israel formulating the great importance, “and this means that he will not have to overcome any of these obstacles. Anything that gives Netanyahu always a good time for him. He did this before.

“By setting a transfer plan on the table, Trump Bin Ghafir and Smotrich paid much closer to Netanyahu,” Israeli political analyst Nimrod Homerinberg said of the recent challenges that Netanyahu made from his right wing.

“Bin Ghaffir said that this is close to returning to the government, and Smotrich said that this advertisement makes preserving the government more important,” referring to their declared willingness to support the government through at least the second stage of the ceasefire from three stages if the endgame game is the purification Ethnic for Gaza.