US President Donald Trump He claimed that some of Joe Biden pardon Not valid because the former president claimed that the autopsy.

Trump wrote on March 17 on the truth: “The” pardon “that Sleepy Joe Biden gave to the committee not related to political thugs, many others, invalid, vacant, and there is no force or additional impact, because of the fact that they were done by the pilots.” He referred to Biden for members of Congress who served in the committee that was achieved on January 6, 2021, the American Capitol attack.

It is not certain whether Biden used “anatomy” – a mechanical device that uses an automatic arm with a connected pen – to sign a pardon. However, Trump also claimed that Biden “did not sign” pardon and “did not know anything about them!”

Trump’s publication followed his remarks a few days before Biden’s use to create an autopsy.

Trump said on March 13: “Everything was signed by anatomy of the bodies – almost everything,” Trump said on March 13.

Biden is not the first American president to use corpses. President Barack Obama, John F. Kennedy Thomas Jefferson used automated pilot or mechanical signature devices.

We have found a global agreement between legal scholars that the constitution does not require the signing of direct human pardon, subsequent judicial decisions and legal notes that support the use of automated pilot for similar purposes. Legal scientists also agree that there is no constitutional mechanism to cancel the amnesty as soon as it is granted.

A White House Press Press Office referred to the press secretary Caroline Levit on March 17, who was in response to a correspondent asking whether White House lawyers had told Trump that he had the legal authority to reflect pardon Biden because of the autopsy.

Levitt did not answer this question directly, but he said: “The president was raising the point, did the president even knew this amnesty?

When we asked the White House if Trump had used an autopsy, a spokesman for Trump’s comments indicated to reporters the night before Air Force One. “I never use it.

The constitution does not address the methodology of the pardon document

Pardon from Article Two, Article 2, Paragraph 1 says that the president has The authority to grant pardon But it does not mention “a sign” or “signature”. More than half of the decorations of Politifacts experts have been told that they did not see any restrictions in the constitution to use the autopsy.

“The President has the power of amnesty, but there are no specifications (unlike the signing of the bills) that this pardon is written.” Thus, it is not clear that the signature will be required, because the decision to pardon can be oral and not written. “

In comparison, Article 7, Section 7 says that the draft laws that pass the House of Representatives and the Senate “are submitted to the President of the United States;

Frank or Bowman III, a law professor at Missouri University, referred to images of amnesty from the presidency of Ibrahim Lincoln, which sometimes does not match each other, nor does the documented Lincoln signature elsewhere.

This is because “in the nineteenth century, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, or one of his employees, often suffer from amnesty and signing orders in the name of the president.”

In 2005, during the presidency of George W. Bush, the Office of the Legal Adviser of the Ministry of Justice wrote a memorandum of the president’s lawyer on the legitimacy of the use of an autopsy to sign the draft laws. The administration concluded:

“The president does not need to perform the material act of signing a draft law approved and decides to sign it on the draft law to become a law.

The Memorandum of the Ministry of Justice also said that there are practical reasons for the head of the use of an autopsy, such as when it is far from Washington, DC, or wants to issue a law immediately, for example, to avoid the closure of the government.

“The opinion of the Ministry of Justice gives Biden coverage here.”.

The General Memorandum Office of the lawyer in 1929, inside the Ministry of Justice, said that the spontaneous man must obtain a “symbol” to show that he was pardoned, “This does not need to sign the president, or by signing him.

Recently, the US Court of Appeal for the Fourth District in the 2024 Resolution said that “nothing in the constitution restricts the president’s exercise of the compassion of the ride that was presented through documented writing.”

Trump cannot oppose the pardon for Biden

Legal experts agreed that there is nothing in the constitution or law that allows the opposite of the pardon.

“Pardon is final and irreversible,” he said.

In the ruling of 1869, a federal court wrote: “There is no doubt that the law is that when the amnesty is completed, there is no authority to cancel it, that is, more than the authority to cancel any other complete work.”

The presentation of the argument that the amnesty can be reversed is a danger to Trump itself.

“Even with the concept of Trump for the unlimited presidential power, the future president can withdraw from anything he did – and I assume he will not be happy with that,” said Michael Gerhardt, a law professor at North Carolina University.

Trump issued a pardon for January 6, 2021, the defendants.

“The presidents historically did not personally sign an amnesty granted for each individual Compassion Dan Copel, a professor of law school, said.

The claims started with the entity of the Heritage Foundation

Trump’s dissection demands followed the participants earlier in March by the control project of the Conservative Heritage Foundation.

The monitoring project wrote on March 6 on X. “Whoever controls the automated pilot controls the presidency.”

The supervision project wrote that he collected documents with Biden Presidential signature and found “all of them using the same signing Exit from the 2024 race.

The monitoring project on the automated pilot has published about dozens of times a week, and the “Automated Pilot scandal” shown. One leaflet offered signatures of several amnesty from the amnesty issued on January 19, his full final day in his position. This was the day when the legislators who served in the Congress Committee presented to investigate January 6, 2021, American Capitol attack.

The national archives told the Snips site, which studies the facts that the official documents published in the federal registry are using a copy of the signature of the president submitted by the White House.

“At the beginning of each administration, the White House sends a sample of the president’s signature to the federal registry office, which he uses to create a graphic image of all presidential documents published in the Federal Registry,” the national archives were written to Snips.

Contact Politifact with national archives and did not hear immediately.

Our rule

Trump said that Biden’s amnesty for the legislators of the committee who achieved on January 6, 2021, the American Capitol attack “is announced by void, vacant, and there is no force or additional effect,” because they were “done by the automated pilot.”

It is unclear whether Biden fell into the pardon with the anatomy of the body. But even if he did so, half of the legal experts said that the constitution does not require the signing of a pardon by the president.

The notes of the Public Prosecutor’s Office in 1929 and the Office of the Legal Adviser at the Ministry of Justice in 2005 says that both the signing of the president’s hand, and the presidents, including Lincoln, had subordinates who were pardoning pardoning on their behalf.

There is no constitutional mechanism to cancel the amnesty, and a court ruling 1869 found that once it was delivered, the pardon is final. There is no legal precedent that the pardon is invalid if it is signed by a machine instead of the president.

The burden of proof of the speaker, and Trump did not provide any evidence of a legal way to announce the torment of Biden.

Based on the current legal precedents, we evaluate the wrong statement.

Politifact Caryn Baired researcher examined this fact.