Digest opened free editor

Rola Khaleda, FT editor, chooses her favorite stories in this weekly newsletter.

Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday that he will turn the head of local espionage, one of the last security officials who have been in the Post since the Hamas attack on October 7, in a step appointed to deepen the crisis between the Israeli Prime Minister and legal authorities in the country.

Netanyahu Ronin Bar, the head of the Shen Bit Intelligence Agency, told a tense meeting that he was removing him from this position, and depending on a government decision later in the week.

In a recorded video statement, the Prime Minister said he was “suffering from a lack of confidence” in the bar, which “grown only over time.”

“I am convinced that this step is decisive in order to restore the organization, achieve all the goals of our war, and to prevent the upcoming tragedy,” added Netanyahu, a reference to the role of Shane Pitt in the tremendous failure of the intelligence that led to the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023 in southern Israel.

However, the intended dismissal of Paar is likely to deepen the divisions between Netanyahu and senior legal officials in the country.

Public Prosecutor Ghali Paraf Mayara He said in a statement on Sunday to Netanyahu that he could not shoot a tape “until the realistic and legal basis for your decision and your ability to deal with this issue is clarified.”

Tensions have grown between Netanyahu and Barr in recent weeks due to the agency’s investigation into the alleged pressure work carried out by assistants at the Prime Minister’s Office on behalf of Qatar.

Netanyahu also recently removed both Bar and the head of the Israeli Foreign Spy Agency, Mossad, David Barnia, from the team in charge of negotiating the ceasefire deal with Hamas in Gaza, claiming that they were taking a soft line in the talks and leaking unavailable details about the government’s situation in the media.

Netanyahu tried to blame a sudden attack by Palestinian militants on security chiefs.

Defense Minister at that time, YOAV canHe was dismissed last November, while he was a military president Herzi Mahiri I was forced to go out earlier this month.

Both officials, as well as Bar, publicly responsible for their roles in the worst security failure in the country’s history and mentioned their intention to step down when the time was right.

For his part, Netanyahu refused for more than 17 months to carry any blame, resignation or setting a date for the new elections.

In a challenging statement later on Sunday, Bar said that his general duty asked him to “continue my position in the near future” because of the possibility of renewed hostilities in Gaza, and the constant hostilities and the need to “complete a number of sensitive investigations.”

He also blamed the October 7 attack on the foot of the Netanyahu government, which has put a policy in Gaza in Gaza for years before the attack and ignored the warnings of Shin Pitt.

“The duty of confidence deserved by President of Shane Hanhan is first and foremost for the citizens of Israel. Bar added that the Prime Minister’s expectations for a personal confidence that contradicts him with the public interest is mainly a wrong expectation.”

The government ministers praised the Prime Minister’s movement, and described it away, while opposing politicians criticized it as non -democratic and illegal.

“Netanyahu Ronin Barr launched for only one reason:” Qatar “. Yair Lapid, the opposition leader, wrote on the social media platform X, adding that he would submit a petition to the Supreme Court to remove the bar.

This month, the Cabinet in Netanyahu began official procedures for shooting at the same Baharrav Mayra, and indicated that they did not recognize the authority of the newly appointed president of the Supreme Court and his seat in the separation of constitutional issues.

In the period before the Hamas attack, where the militants killed 1,200 people and took 250 hostages, Israel witnessed nine consecutive months of common protests against Netanyahu’s plan to reform judicial institutions in the country.

Reform critics called it the seizure of power by the executive branch would undermine the authority of the courts and legal officials.