Stay in view of the free updates

Simply subscribe to artificial intelligence Myft Digest – it is delivered directly to your inbox.

On a modern trip to France, I spoke with the woman adjacent to me and took over. She worked as a banker, and she now used Chatbot to write most of her correspondence with colleagues and clients.

She explained that writing was never its strong view, and the application was able to create a text that captured what she wanted to say better than she could. She joined that she would use her to write messages to friends and family before she knew that, and she answered with caution that she already has, asking for a modern birthday text.

She suggested that she did not feel that she was doing what she was wrong. However, like many others, it now uses Amnesty International to produce vast areas of personal and professional communication, without knowing those who receive these messages created from artificial intelligence.

While companies explore how to benefit from obstetric artificial intelligence in profitable ways TransformationThere is a quiet revolution already among its employees. Lawyers, bankers, doctors and many other professionals are now regularly used to write to colleagues, clients, customers and patients.

The company’s executives seem to be reduced by the extent of their employees widely using technology.

Last October, a reconnaissance Written by Deloitte on absorption in Europe, I found nearly half (47 percent) of the respondents familiar with the Importer I intelligently used for personal activities, while a quarter (23 percent) had used it to work. The report also revealed that a quarter of the employees used the models they paid for themselves.

This is within two years of the Chatgpt version, an application that costs $ 20 per month for Plus that comes without covers on use. Last month, the free China competitor, Deepseek, displaced Chatgpt from Openai at the top of the application stores. Its popularity can lead to a broader adoption of artificial intelligence.

The DELOTTE survey, which surveyed 30,000 consumers and employees in 11 countries, stated that 63 percent of employees who use the Trucific I intelligence said that their company encouraged (44 percent) or allows (19 percent) to use work purposes. But nearly a quarter (23 percent) said that their organization does not have a policy of artificial intelligence.

This lack of clarity has increased the use of the shadow, which means that some companies have no idea of ​​a little or no idea of ​​what their employees do. While there are hopes that Amnesty International can Improving productivityIt will come at a cost if the lack of training and supervision means that the inaccurate information is connected between employees or customers. Confidential details can be in danger if workers use unveiled tools that do not adhere to security and privacy standards.

research By the European Center for Vocational Training Development, one in seven adult workers in the European labor markets are now found with digital tools that complement them, with 22 percent of employees who use artificial intelligence to learn, translate, create or create text.

Most media organizations, including FT, have policies indicating that the press cannot be pressed Created by AI. But what about communicating with colleagues? Is it acceptable to use the Touli artificial intelligence to formulate an email to a manager who requests an increase in wages, or writing a member’s performance review?

There is also a risk that employees who use artificial intelligence believe in technology. In the DELOTTE report, 70 percent of users said they trust Amnesty International News Articles. The number is 64 percent on personal matters such as tax declarations or benefits. last A survey focusing on the United Kingdom I found that 36 percent of users accidentally believed that artificial intelligence was in reality.

AI is improved all the time, but errors are still increasingly common and difficult. Last year, the actual technology company male The artificial intelligence models regularly drop press features of summaries, such as removing “Salle Sain” from the news. For a lawyer who reviews an issue, negligence like this may be it is very important.

What about the way this technology is rapidly woven in our personal life? Does it matter if a birthday note is formulated by artificial intelligence, or is it still the idea that concerns? Is a world that helps chatbots those who struggle to turn ideas into words better than a world where he writes less, or does the personal voice wear something we must preserve? It is clear that more companies should provide the outline that explains how their employees can use artificial intelligence to communicate. As a society, we must do the same.

Sam.joiner@ft.com